Newsvine
  • Welcome
  • Help
  • Report Bug
  • Conversation Tracker
  • Your Column
  • Replies
  • Friends
Type Comments Since You Last CheckedArticle Source Last Checked Stop Tracking All Clear Tracking All
Advertise | AdChoices
Log In | Register
Close the Login Panel
Existing users log in below. New users please register for a free account.

New Users:

Existing Users:

E-Mail:
Password:
Forgot Password?
Please enter the e-mail address or domain name you registered with:
E-Mail/Domain:
Back to Login
Log Out
  • Top News
  • Local News
  • World
  • U.S.
  • Sports
  • Politics
  • Tech
  • Entertainment
  • Science
  • Business
  • Health
  • Odd News
  • More
    • Arts
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Fashion
    • History
    • Home & Garden
    • Not News
    • Religion
    • Travel
Visit Que2646's column >>

QUE2646

Home Page
Retired science teacher.
Articles Posted: 101  Links Seeded: 87
Member Since: 8/2009  Last Seen: 5/16/2012

What is Newsvine?

Updated continuously by citizens like you, Newsvine is an instant reflection of what the world is talking about at any given moment.

Get a Free Account
Help
Fun Stuff
  • Your Clippings
  • Leaderboard
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Top of the Vine
  • Newsvine Live
  • Newsvine Archives
  • The Greenhouse
  • Recommended Articles
  • Wall of Vineness
Put a Seed Newsvine link on your own site

Climate sceptics – who gets paid what? | Environment | guardian.co.uk

Seeded on Sun Feb 19, 2012 9:09 PM EST
Read ArticleArticle Source: Guardian Unlimited
environment, not-news, anthony-watts, climate-change-denial, fred-singer, bob-carter, craig-idso, heartland-inst, joseph-blast
Seeded by Que2646
Advertise | AdChoices

Apparently it pays well to be a climate skeptic. The leaked Heartland Institute budget shows that the president and CEO, Joseph Blast, earns $145,000 a year, 2 or 3 times as much as most University or government scientists. Although Anthony Watts' Surface Station Project has been thoroughly discredited by the American Geophysical Union, he will receive $88,000 to continue it. His new project is to establish a website to take NOAA's temperature data and display it in graphical form. Interestingly, NASA already provides that.

Fred Singer will receive $5000 per month to tell us again that carbon dioxide is not a pollutant and Craig Idso will receive $11,600 per month to explain the wonders of increased carbon dioxide on plant growth, although world food crops seem to be declining. Bob Carter received a measly $1667 per month to claim that we don't know the cause of global warming but he thinks it's natural. His take is low because he has been challenged to prove that and so far has produced one weak, easily rebutted article.

  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Published to:

  • Que2646's Column, All of Newsvine
  • Groups: 112th United States Congress, 2012 US Elections, Climate Change, Climate Change - Human Caused, Climate Dynamics, Election 2012, Green Gadgets & Controls , Green Politics, Heated Debate, Moderate Americans, Newsvine Science, ObamaVine, OklahomaViners, Palins Pundits, Republican, Republican Progressives, Save Environment Save Wildlife, Science And Technology, Science of Climate, Teachers, The Cherokee Lodge, US News and Views , Utilizing Green Energy, Writers
  • Regions: none
  • Public Discussion (3)
Que2646

The list did not include Patrick Michaels, as he apparently has another source of funding. He has been asked to return to Congress to explain an apparent underreporting income on his disclosure form by somewhere near $1 million - from sources that would make his testimony suspect. A Colorado energy company, IREA, recently paid him $100,000 to refute the dangers of global warming. Apparently it's much more profitable to be a skeptic than a real scientist, and it is likely much easier.

  • 3 votes
Reply#1 - Sun Feb 19, 2012 9:22 PM EST
Physicist-retired

A good seed, Que - bookmarked.

Apparently it's much more profitable to be a skeptic than a real scientist, and it is likely much easier.

The first part is rather obvious. As for the second, I think you might enjoy this. Definitely less work involved when playing the part of the denier.

  • 3 votes
Reply#2 - Mon Feb 20, 2012 2:38 PM EST
nonStitiousZealot

Hey ... where's my damn check ?!

    Reply#3 - Mon Feb 20, 2012 8:53 PM EST
    Leave a Comment:
    You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
    You're in XHTML Mode. If you prefer, you can use Easy Mode instead.
    (XHTML tags allowed - a,b,blockquote,br,code,dd,dl,dt,del,em,h2,h3,h4,i,ins,li,ol,p,pre,q,strong,ul)
    Newsvine Privacy Statement
    As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
    FUN STUFF:
    • Leaderboard |
    • E-Mail Alerts |
    • Top of the Vine |
    • Newsvine Live |
    • Newsvine Archives |
    • The Greenhouse |
    COMPANY STUFF:
    • Code of Honor |
    • Company Info |
    • Contact Us |
    • Jobs |
    • User Agreement |
    • Privacy Policy |
    • About our ads
    LEGAL STUFF:
    • © 2005-2012 Newsvine, Inc. |
    • Newsvine® is a registered trademark of Newsvine, Inc. |
    • Newsvine is a property of msnbc.com